Bridget Dolan QC

Call 1997 | Silk 2016

Bridget Dolan QC | Call 1997 | Silk 2016

Back to Our People

Overview

Bridget is a recognised specialist in Coronial Law who aims to bring sensitivity and humanity to the inquest process. In addition to being appointed Counsel to the Coroner/Judge in a large number of high media profile, lengthy and complex inquests and inquiries she sits as an Assistant Coroner and edits both the Inquest Law Reports and the UK Inquest Law blog.

Inquests & Inquiries

Bridget Dolan QC appointed as counsel to the coroner in the inquests into the six deaths in the 2021 Plymouth shootings.

“Consummate knowledge of the law, tactical excellence and exceptional humanity in dealing with people who are coming to terms with a difficult process”
Chambers & Partners 2021

experience & expertise

Bridget is regularly instructed in inquests and inquiries of the greatest complexity and sensitivity acting for bereaved families, individual interested persons and for public or corporate bodies. Her experience includes countless lengthy ‘Article 2’ inquests following deaths in prison, after police contact or in psychiatric detention. She is particularly sought after when public bodies are facing difficult and searching inquiries.

Bridget also has considerable experience of acting as Counsel to the Judge or Coroner in extremely high media profile inquiries including the seven British inquests that followed the murders of 40 men by Al-Quaeda linked terrorists at the In Amenas gas plant in Algeria (a role which earned her The Lawyer ‘barrister of the year’ award in 2015). She was Counsel to the judge hearing each of the three fresh inquests into the deaths of young Army recruits at Deepcut Barracks. In the past year Bridget has been instructed by five different Senior Coroners as their ‘Counsel to the Inquest’ in cases as varied as the ‘Shoreham Aircrash’ inquests, the six inquests arising from the 2021 ‘Keyham Shootings’, two inquests into deaths during an Army selection exercise, a death on a ‘Smart motorway’ and a death during police restraint.

That she sits part-time as an Assistant Coroner gives Bridget a particular insight into how to approach the most challenging of cases. Her extensive legal knowledge is put to good use the editor of the Inquest Law Reports and the popular UK Inquest Law Blog.

Bridget has extensive public law experience, both bringing and defending judicial review claims related to Coronial Law. She also provides wider operational advice to public and corporate bodies regarding coronial law, preventing future deaths and related risk management.

Cases and work of note

Inquests
Bridget’s inquest practice covers the entire range of heavyweight cases that come before a Coroner including deaths following clinical negligence, in accidents at work or during in MOD exercises, deaths after restraint and fatal self-harm by detainees.

Bridget acted for bereaved parents after NHS staff unconscionably refused to admit their suicidal daughter to a psychiatric unit and where, after the inquest, the police investigated three NHS staff for allegedly perverting the course of justice.  As well as securing damages for Art 2 and Art 3 breaches Bridget has recently helped her direct access clients secure a fresh inquest so that the evidence originally withheld can now be fully examined.   Other recent cases on behalf of families include acting for a man who police had initially arrested on suspicion of murdering his niece (the Coroner found the death to have been suicide) and for the family of a confused elderly man who fell to his death from a general hospital window when left unattended.

Bridget is particularly sought after when public bodies are facing difficult and searching inquiries. She represented an NHS Trust in a substantial Art 2 inquest following the death of patient in a secure unit where police were investigating alleged fraudulent entries in medical records, and acted for a Consultant Psychiatrist in another inquest where, despite the Coroner having referred the matter to the CPS to consider corporate manslaughter charges, the inquest jury eventually made no criticism of her client, the patient’s responsible clinician.

Inquiries
Bridget has represented public bodies and individual stakeholders in public and other inquiries throughout her career.  Starting 20 years ago she acted as Counsel to the Inquiry into the care and treatment of Michael Stone following his convictions for the murder of Lin and Megan Russell. She was an advisor on Coronial Law to the ‘Public Inquiry into Hyponatraemia related deaths’ in Northern Ireland and more recently has been commissioned by the Ministry of Justice as ‘Counsel to the Inquiry’ for an Art 2 investigation following a near death in prison, and is instructed by a core participant in the ‘Novichok’ Public Inquiry into the death of Dawn Sturgess.

Judicial Review of Coroners’ decisions
Bridget is particularly sought after to advise and represent parties in challenges to Coroner’s decisions. She has represented Senior Coroners and other parties in numerous High Court cases recent decisions include:

HM Coroner for West Sussex v Secretary of State for Transport [2022] 215 EWHC:  Whether material deployed in public at a criminal trial may subsequently be used by a Coroner if it is covered by the regulations protecting AAIB material;

Davison v Senior Coroner for Hertfordshire [2022] EWHC (Admin): Whether new expert evidence justified a fresh inquest.

Mays v Senior Coroner for Kingston upon Hull [2021] EWHC 3604 (Admin): Whether a fresh inquest was required where relevant material had been knowingly withheld from the first.

Skelton v Senior Coroner for West Sussex [2020] 2813 EWHC (Admin): Whether Art 2 obligations were engaged where police investigatory failures were alleged.

Re Bailey [2018] EWHC 3443 (Admin): Whether a fresh inquest should be ordered four decades after the first given the new information regarding the cause of death.

Tainton v HM Coroner for Preston [2016] 4 WLR 157, defeating the application for a fresh inquest in a case that made ground-breaking findings as to the wider scope of inquest conclusions when Art 2 duties are engaged.

Her clear and sound advice often successfully resolves matters for her client without the need for expensive litigation.  In numerous cases Bridget has helped defeat a challenge to the adequacy of a Coroner’s decision by drafting a robust response to a letter before action, or the court has refused permission to bring Judicial Review after reading Bridget’s detailed response to the claim.

seminars and Lectures

Following from Bridget’s previous career as a lecturer at St George’s Medical School she is sought after to provide teaching and training for judges, lawyers and other professionals.   She has been commissioned to deliver training at all levels, for High Court Judges, Senior Coroners and Mental Health Tribunal Judges through to undergraduate students. She is always happy to work with solicitors firms and public bodies to devise and present custom-made training.

recommendations

“The experience of dealing with her is immensely reassuring due to her consummate knowledge of the law, her tactical excellence and her exceptional humanity in dealing with people who are coming to terms with a difficult process, the outcome of which is critical to them.” “Bridget Dolan is an exceptional lawyer who is highly respected in her field. Whilst she is at the top of her game she also has the ability to clearly explain complex issues in a way that everyone can understand.”
Chambers & Partners 2021

‘One of the best in her field. She offers sensible, clear, professional advice, and is available at very short notice.’
The Legal 500 2021

“An absolutely fantastic quality inquests expert. She asks tough questions when you need them and soft ones when you don’t.” “She’s extremely good at coming up with the weird and wonderful to get you out of trouble. She isn’t your usual barrister: she has a mind that works about twice as fast and then the solution that comes out is novel, original, well thought out and legally exceptional.” “She’s sensible, pragmatic and calm and clients love her.”
Chambers & Partners 2020

‘Her mind is unbelievably quick and her solutions to novel problems indicate an ability to think laterally.’
The Legal 500 2019

“She’s an excellent advocate, is extremely knowledgeable and has an approachable personal style which leaves people feeling at ease.”
Chambers & Partners 2019

‘Very knowledgeable on the practical side of inquests and knows how coroners think.’
The Legal 500 2018

“She is technically excellent, really good with clients and fantastic in court.” 
Chambers & Partners 2018

‘She knows how the system works and what the coroners need to hear.’
The Legal 500 2017

“Absolutely excellent and incredibly clever, she knows how the coroner will approach a matter. She’s very clear and precise, and has a good approach with witnesses. One of the best cross-examiners at the Bar.”
Chambers & Partners 2017

“Very bright and knowledgeable, with a good feel for what is likely to happen.”  “She doesn’t miss anything and gives the impression of being a couple of steps ahead of everyone else.”  
The Legal 500 2016

“She is sensible in court and takes a practical approach to the issues in the case and how to deal with them. She also has a solid base of clinical knowledge.” “Even under huge amounts of pressure she has a calm, controlled and collected approach.”
Chambers & Partners 2016

“Passionate about her work, she’s a thorough and utterly reliable counsel, who is able to deliver digestible advice in tricky cases.” “She is utterly dependable and has a keen eye for important details missed by others.”
Chambers & Partners 2015

“A delight to work with and has comprehensive knowledge of the law.” “She is smart, perceptive and absolutely excellent with clients.
The Legal 500 2015

“A go-to for heavyweight medical cases… She provides well thought-out advice, is very pragmatic and is good at cross-examining experts and asking the right questions.” “She is wonderful on cases overlapping with mental health; she’s an absolute authority there. She’s good with more troubled clients, has a lovely manner and is patient.”
Chambers & Partners 2014

“A user-friendly team player.”
The Legal 500 2014

“Highly rated’ … ‘very sensible, approachable and open.’ She is ‘the kind of advocate that judges like.”
Chambers & Partners 2013