Christopher Johnston QC

Call 1990 | Silk 2011

Christopher Johnston QC | Call 1990 | Silk 2011

Back to Our People

Overview

Chris is recognised as one of the top claimant product liability silks. Throughout his career he has been involved in complex group actions, starting with the dental quantum group action Appleton v Garrett. He has extensive experience of medical device and pharmaceutical litigation. He is ranked as a leading silk by both the leading legal directories, and is described by Chambers & Partners as “a hands-on silk and is fantastic with clients.”

Product Liability

“Has the ability to explain ferociously complex cases in simple, straightforward language. His forensic approach to the issues means no stone is left unturned.”
Chambers & Partners

Baker v KTM: It is not necessary to show how a defect was caused.”
Read Chris’ post on our UK Healthcare Law blog, here.

experience & expertise

Chris authored the very well received “A personal (and selective) introduction to product liability law” for the Journal of Personal Injury Law.  He was junior counsel (with Heidi Knight and James Berry) in the Fetal Anticonvulsant Litigation which involved over 100 claimants in a major group action relating to birth defects caused by exposure to the anti-epileptic drug Epilim during pregnancy. This was an exceptionally complex case requiring in-depth analysis of medical evidence in a variety of fields including clinical pharmacology, teratology, neuropsychology and both adult and infant epilepsy. Chris took on the immense technological challenge of reviewing the extensive disclosure produced in the case.

More recently he has been instructed in a number of million-pound class actions against various manufacturers arising out of difficulties patients have experienced with metal on metal hip implants and resurfacings.

The current edition of Chambers & Partners summarises as folllows: he has been involved in a number of recent, highly publicised group actions relating to medical devices, on which he can also bring to bear his top-notch clinical negligence expertise.”

Recommendations

“Methodical and well prepared in everything he does. He has a no-nonsense approach to everything and everyone, and cuts through the peripheral issues that often plagues high-profile group litigation. He is a hands-on silk and is fantastic with clients.”
Chambers & Partners

‘His disarming application of logic has an equal tendency to dishearten opponents and impress judges.’
The Legal 500

“A joy to work with. He is an original thinker. He comes up with ideas that haven’t been thought of before. It’s always good to have him on your side.”
Chambers & Partners

“Practical, with good attention to detail; always buzzing with ideas.”
The Legal 500